stellarvue 82 degree eyepiece

And the included velvety storage bag is very nice. The one piece of information I have not been able to find here or on other forums is what FOVs people prefer, whether the specified field of view is at specific focal lengths or in general. It is just on the edge of being sensitive to what EP you can throw in the focuser and get good results. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 15 percent of the field and are still tight at the edge, though with some lateral chromatic aberration. In short, I found it uncomfortable to use. This eyepiece is ideal for higher power work on planets and double stars since it is very sharp, contrasty and has a generous 82 degree field of view. Please note that this tool is only intended to provide a first orientation and the results are in no way binding. The Omegons weight is 600 grams, at the lower end of the range for eyepieces in this group. . 2023 Astromart.com. The 102 degree Nikon HWs are another good example. ***Apparent Field of View measured in degrees. They make a good addition to the Stellaruve brandedplanetary eyepieces he has already been selling. Now I see all 3 at half price sale for under $300 for them and that's pretty good, imo! Bottom Line: A better bargain 82 eyepiece. It's hard to keep track of them all. ), Call us at: 530 823 7796 Open Mon-Fri 9-5 Pacific Time, Read the review of the Stellarvue Optimus eyepieces by Tony Hallas in the May 2017 issue of Astronomy, Our EOP eyepieces are now loaded into AstronomyTools database and application. When using hand driven alt-azimuth mounts this generous field will be appreciated. Toss-up, both a bargain @ $200. It comes with a pouch with a belt clip. I would be very surprised to find out that this new Stellarvue line is not the same as the new TS UWAN line. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. Ive never been a fan of zoom eyepieces. Bottom Line: A good ultra-wide eyepiece for the money. But the soft eyecup nicely places your eye where it needs to be with no kidney-bean blackout. There's also a comfort factor. Pros: Very good optical performance and construction; long eye relief. But the original Ethos remains unmatched for optics. It is plenty wide enough and 1.25 inch 82 degree eyepieces are just so much more compact than their 100 degree counterparts. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. I find the Televue better, but both the ES and UWA are very close. Theres a new alternative for the Celestron NexStar SE and NexStar Evolution series tripod a short, foldable tabletop tripod. Enter the maximum grade, the minimum passing grade, and your current overall grade in the grading system of your university. Certainly a keeper. It sounds like at $65 a piece it would be hard to do any better. I missed the 16mm and regretted it as it's a very useful focal length. I have the Stellarvue 15mm UWA and it needs some focal length to clean up the field as curvature starts getting beyond tolerable for my eye around the 65-70% mark in an f/7 600mm refractor. Features --20mm focal length --100 apparent field --15mm eye relief --9 element design --fully multi-coated Very fast shipping and packaging. Fully-multi-coated lenses, rubber grip, 43 mm field lens and 2" filter threads. I wouldn't expect additional focal lengths. And if you like the UWANs, see my review of the WO XWA. They look very much alike the new TS UWANs, but with a special Stellarvue twist reminiscent of their 100 line. The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. Back in my youth I worked for a company that "made" computer monitors and the OEM was required to make it to our specs, but others were not. The eyepiece is turned my 115 into a whole new scope for visual observing. In the case of the old JOC days, the axiom LX 15mm was probably the same as the 14mm UWA. Thanks for any input if anyone is still watching here. It is important the image stays sharp as it crosses the field, and it does in both eyepieces, but the Ethos SX is better for double stars and planets. display: none !important; However, with your eye positioned where it needs to be to see the whole field, the field partially blacks out with squirming kidney-bean shadows (technically called spherical aberration of the exit pupil). LMU - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen, Macromedia University of Applied Sciences, Mediadesign University of Applied Sciences. Grade Conversion using the Bavarian Formula. I need at least 22mm of effective eye relief. Performance is excellent, with stars sharp across all but the outer 10 percent of the field. At a measured 13mm, eye relief seems a little tight, and 1.5mm less than specified, due to the eye lens being more deeply recessed than in the others. I did sell a lot of axiom LXs though, and owned the 23mm for a while and was impressed with it. 70 is fine at low power, 78-85 fine at medium power, but I prefer 110 at high power. 51,000 students. Uhno. It comes with a vinyl storage bag and the eyepiece is fully waterproof it can even be submerged for cleaning! How are the new Orion SkyQuest dobsonians? They slap on the "15mm" on the side and everybody assumes it is actually 15mm, when it is really 14mm. Theres a new alternative for the Celestron NexStar SE and NexStar Evolution series tripod a short, foldable tabletop tripod. All in all, exactly what you'd expect from Stellarvue: A great product at a reasonable price. Drift time is about 20 seconds. Stellarvue 8mm UWA 82 degree eyepice that has never been used. With some help from the members here, I'm awaiting a 28mm 82 degree Stellarview EP. Honestly, I don't mind a 50-degree view, but 70 is definitely more immersive. You currently have javascript disabled. That is a beast and my first 2 eyepiece. But I can't confirm, and they could be a whole new OEM same as the luminos perhaps, rather than the initial SV82 which I am pretty sure was the UWAN. Bottom Line: The standard of performance for 100 eyepieces. Incredible clarity across the entire field of view. We are not all the same when it comes to eye relief requirements, especially when choosing an eyepiece that has more elements than the 5 element budget wide field types. i think that what you are going to hear is : "what are you interested in looking at ?" With the 20 mm I will then have 32, 20, 16 and 10 mm equivalents. We all have different preferences for eyepieces. New from Stellarvue, ultra-wide eyepieces. Cons: Slightly soft off-axis performance. Not saying that's a bad thing, just sort of distracting. I briefly experimented with a 100-degree eyepiece but it felt exactly like the 82-degree field, with the exception of shorter eye relief. Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle 15mm MSRP $150 Pros: Low price; good eye relief; solid construction. Here is a good listing of who actually makes applianceshttp://www.appliancehase/make.shtml. Reducer Flatteners for other telescopes, Finderscope Eyepieces with Focusing Reticle, Barlows to double the power of your eyepieces, Stellarvue 15 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-15.0, Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.0, Stellarvue 8 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-08.0, Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Set - EUW-SET. There are lots of OEM products floating around. I've owned all the WO UWAN in the past but sold off all of them except the 4mm. But what matters is who you buy it from, the specifications, customer service, reliability, and price (of course), when making your actual purchasing decision. This affect is more pronounced in lower magnification, wide-field EP's. I tested nine brands of 82 eyepieces, all in the 13 mm to 16 mm range, a focal length that provides moderate power on most telescopes and so is suitable for all types of viewing. For some reason, uncle Al seems to have a monopoly on 13-16mm compact 82s that perform well in fast scopes as the 16 UWAN was the weak link in that line as well, but I don't remember ever trying the 16, or scrutinizing the 15mm axiom LX vs the 14 Meade or ES. They look as good to my eye as any of the other high-end eyepieces I've used. Just received the set. Are these made by United Optical? Why 5 stars? Collecting EP's is a journey for sure in finding out what you really like. Teasing me? This my first refractor, my first telescope with quality optics, my first telescope with a wide field of view, and my first telescope with a decent focuser (among other firsts) so I am very excited and anxious to get my hands on it. This is a superb eyepiece for the money, with the bonus of argon-filled waterproof construction to keep moisture from penetrating and fogging the eyepiece on humid nights. It's all part of the marketing game. Edited by timmbottoni, 03 November 2014 - 08:49 PM. Though if you want the best, this is it. The contrast is good and the view is clear from edge to edge. Bottom Line: Another fine ultra-wide eyepiece for the money. Oh, barlowed the 15mm starts to show curvature around the 80-85% mark for my eye and the 4 and the 8mm the same since already barlowed. This 9 mm eyepiece is ideal for moderate power work on moons, planets and dark sky objects. Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #48, Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #52, private (state-approved) University of Applied Sciences, View all 231 courses still open for next intake, Marketing services for German Universities. if(sWOTrackPage)sWOTrackPage(); Pros: Good off-axis sharpness and eye relief, but . But I'm thinking a pair of the 16's might make a nice selection for binoviewers. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. I am also intrigued by the 4mm. But I'm interested in the 16mm as I don't have a UWA in that focal length (I used to have the old 5000 series Meade 18mm UWA but sold it). Be informed, it can't hurt you. The jump from 50 to 70 provides a much larger leap than 70 to 100 to my eyes. The apparent field is indeed noticeably wider than the other 82s. Another good example is the 50mm finderscope, from both WO and SV (I have both, mostly the same, both excellent). As good as these 82 eyepieces are, if your budget allows, you might want to consider an even wider 100 eyepiece. Eye relief is a very long 20mm. Good decision! Cheers. Reducer Flatteners for other telescopes, Finderscope Eyepieces with Focusing Reticle, Barlows to double the power of your eyepieces, Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Set - EUW-SET, Stellarvue Optimus Eyepiece Set with Case - EOP-SET, Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.0, Stellarvue 15 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-15.0, Stellarvue 8 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-08.0. And the 31 was the same as the 30uwa/82, but obviously marketed as a 31 nagler alternative. I like short UWA's as I only use muscle drive mounts, and I don't have a UWA in 4mm. EPs: ES 2 . Bottom Line: Very good performance vs. price. Seeing the outer 10 degrees in direct vision is not so easily done. Several functions may not work. Omegon in Germany offers many unique products such as their Panorama2 eyepieces. Building an set of eyepieces takes some time. The ergonomics of them is quite nice to me, fit the hand very well allowing for a good grip on them. In my scopes, I generally use the 3.5 mm Nagler with the 2X TV Barlow as my highest magnification. A 100 degree field of view provides the user with almost 1.5 times the area of an 82 degree eyepiece. 100 degree eyepieces are quite amazing but they are also very large and can be quite heavy. While the NexStar SE/Evolution Celestron, Celestron Tabletop Tripod, NexStar SE. I recently purchased the 9 mm Optimus eyepiece after my excellent experience with the 20 mm Optimus. All marketing. There are more expensive products, but do they perform any better? Old, from WO. I still focused on the field stop and never got the spacewalk views others enjoy. 3. Bottom Line: Near-Ethos image quality for less money. In eyepieces, models with the extreme apparent field of 100 rank at the top for performance - but also price! Thanks for the input, I appreciate it. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series.This ultra wide field eyepiece has almost 3 times the area of a 50 degree eyepiece. Build quality 2nd to none.., relatively light for it's size.., but most of all the view is spectacular, all the way out to that wide 100 degree FOV. The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. I've used them at outreach events and the nice eye relief and the wide viewport really help the public get a good view, especially the little ones that often struggle to find the image. It looks very similar to the Stellarvue 82. sold for a while and that line was 16, 8, 4. For starters, you can get by with your 9mm (unless you need to wear eyeglasses) and 30mm. Despite its size and dual barrel, its mass is only 586 grams, less than some of the competitors. Buy all three of our high end 82 degree eyepieces and save! Will 1.25 inch eyepieces fit ES coma corrector? All of this experimenting made me settle on 70 as a nice middle ground. In my 80/480 refractor, I find even 50 degrees for "high" power to be quite good--e.g., Nagler 3-6 zoom. Keep in mind, like appliances, or anything else, just because the OEM is the same, and they look the same on the outside, it doesn't mean they will always be the same on the inside. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 20 percent. How are the new Orion SkyQuest dobsonians? That is unless it's purely coincidental that these appear to be the same as well-known OEM UWAs, and in fact Vic actually designed and manufactured every single one of them by hand using his automated CNC lathes, grinding and polishing equipment, and then triple tests them before shipping them to the user. But the twist-up mechanism in one unit I tested (which I exchanged) was loose and rattled. $65 a piece is very cheapfor these eyepieces, so you did a very good deal there. Might it not be that Stellarvue just have updated the specifications so that they better represents reality? For planets 30-40 deg. National Ranking. Im hoping these will perform similarly. This 9 mm eyepiece is ideal for moderate power work on moons, planets and dark sky objects. Stars are Nagler-class sharp to the edge even on the Newtonians. Click here to simulate the field of view, 3. But I still prefer the Ethos SX on Uranus and Neptune because it gives me a much longer time between nudges and that allows me to relax more when looking. I recently upgraded my 30mm that came with my Dob to a APM 30mm UFF and its a great EP. If so, you will need eyepieces with longer eye relief. Though advertised as 80, I found the apparent field matched a Naglers 82 field. They are obviously not a redesigned barrel on the old ones. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. I've had both and they are excellent (and same price)! At NEAF, I purchased the 16mm UWA from Stellarvue for $95.I've owned all the WO UWAN in the past but sold off all of them except the 4mm.There was nothing wrong with them. The 16 and 7mm looked diffierent than these didn't they? I find there are very few choices when it comes choosing a high quality 70 to 82 AFOV design that have enough eye relief for me to see the entire FOV. eyepiece will limit observer significantly. Edited by Neanderthal, 05 March 2023 - 09:40 AM. Alan Dyer is an astrophotographer and astronomy author based in Alberta, Canada. Congrats! Although I don't believe I've tried any other the eyepieces. This counterweight system is used to quickly adjust balance on smaller telescopes when eyepieces of different weights used. This is not recommended for shared computers. Based on the 14mm SSW, I can recommended the series, though they are even more costly than Nagler Type 6s. Call us at: 530 823 7796 Open Mon-Fri 9-5 Pacific Time, 3. The knurled grip rings and construction of both are superb. But once i start using something around 1m+ in focal length, I find 70+ degrees is preferable, and if it matches nicely with the scope, the more apparent field the merrier. I had been planning on getting ES 82 degree EP's, but I just couldn't pass these up for the $. Edited by jrbarnett, 08 October 2014 - 02:40 PM. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. He (or his expertly trained staff)machines optical tubes and adapters, polishes lenses, fabricates altazmounts, and yes his triple testing of his refractorsis now legendary! They're just too big and heavy and more of a novelty view for me, whereas my 82's are quite comfortable. Your grading system is A+, A, B, C, D and E (Fail). Eyepieces with 100 apparent fields of view provide the widest actual fields possible at any given focal length (with the exception of the few 110 and 120 models on offer). I think you will find a wide range of preferences. Eye relief is a good 16mm, much longer than the 10mm specified. You may see the shadow of the secondary mirror with this eyepiece and exit pupil. So from a practical point of view, I find there's little difference in drift time. I doubt Vic Maris will reveal who his OEM is. Taken out of the original box for pictures only. I once read that Televue actually bench tests all of their eyepieces before delivery to their customers or dealers; if so they may be unique in this regard. Pros: Best eye relief and off-axis star images. Its smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the bigger ASIAir Plus astrophoto computer, but is it as good? Below shows the 100 degree Ethos alongside the 82 degree Nagler. Posted by Steve Lightstone on 8th Aug 2020. A+ is the highest possible grade, and the lowest grade to pass a course is D. So if you assign numerical values in ascending order starting with 1, the input for the grade conversion is as follows: In the conversion tool, you enter 1as maximum grade (corresponding to A+), and 5 asminimum passing grade (corresponding to D). For 1.25" 82 eyepieces, I have a mixed set of Televue, ES, and UWA. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 10 to 15 percent of the field, so very close to Nagler performance. Please note: Internationally, grading systems used at institutions of higher educations may differ substantially. The 13mm Televue Ethos is $658, the Televue 13mm Nagler is $335. While the 76 Baader Morpheus provides slightly less field of view than the rest, the long eye relief and excellent image quality makes it new favorite of mine, and worthy of consideration. I doubt this as JOC won't sell eyepieces to any US brand other than ES since 2012. All of my scopes are on manual mounts, so I agree, the larger the AFOV the better. Note: For definitions of basic eyepiece characteristics mentioned below, see Ed Tings A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces. Anyone know who makes the StellarVue Planetary eyepieces? Stellarvue 8mm UWA Ultra Wide Angle 82 degree 1.25" Eyepiece - New. These wider fields allow me to see things with my peripheral vision and make the whole experience that much more comfortable and enjoyable. It is Bavaria's largest city and the third largest city in Germany (after Berlin and Hamburg). All rights reserved. Stellarvue makes great scopes and youll love yours. Vixens fine eyepieces dont get the respect they deserve. No question they set the standard. Our EUW eyepieces are now loaded into AstronomyTools database and application. A best buy. Mega gratz on your new scope NIckwin. Pros: Low price; good eye relief; solid construction. TS have kept the old 4/7/16mm focal length specifications. The 16mm is often considered the weakest of the line (though still a decent performer) and I've read a lot of good things about the 4mm. The value for current overall gradeis the numerical value corresponding to your current overall letter grade. Click here to simulate the field of view. Please Log In to view the details for this classified ad. Those I find are easiest to use. Night Sky Challenges and the Astronomical League. (Yeah, yeah, I know that's asking a lot.). This eyepiece gives me 133x mag in my 10 inch Dobsonian. Maybe Vic star tests these though! You will get more use out of middle and low magnification EP's now. Anything is possible. Kunming UWA reskins. Report back witn with your thoughts when you get a chance. Not to say that normal 50 and wide-field 65 eyepieces arent excellent, but for a more immersive viewing experience most telescope owners add at least one, if not several ultra-wide 82 eyepieces to their collection. On the 2-inch focusers on my Newtonians I had to pull the eyepiece out a little in the draw tube to have it reach focus. The Stellarvue 82 is well made, with a compact, solid construction, good 14mm of eye relief (better than the stated 12mm) and a fold-up eyecup. At TUM, grades from 1 to 5 are assigned. Once you look through eyepieces with 82 apparent fields, all lesser eyepieces give the impression of looking down a tunnel. And of course your first light with the other eyepieces and the sweet SV80A (it's on my short list!). Bottom Line: A well-made eyepiece but costly for the performance. But its the design and optical ease of a design that makes an eyepiece good for me. All important info for international students in Germany (2023/2024), 0 (90 programs for EU citizens/Non-EU), 21,000 per semester (1 program for EU citizens/Non-EU), Program Fees: 0 - 10,000 (per semester), Program Fees: 0 - 9,750 (per semester), Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Hochschule der Bayerischen Wirtschaft (HDBW), Hochschule Fresenius - University of Applied Sciences. Explore Scientific 11 mm - 82 Argon Purged Waterproof 1.25" Eyepiece SKU: EXS-EPWP8211-01 Focal Length: 11 mm Apparent Field of View: 82 degrees Barrel Size: 1.25" Eye Relief: 15.6 mm Free shipping $229.99 In Stock Add to cart As low as $7.43/Month Apertura 9mm - 27mm Zoom Eyepiece SKU: APT-ZOOM927 Focal Length: 9mm - 27mm Joining an astronomy club can also put more eyepieces in your focuser to the test. This is the original 100 eyepiece and is still the standard of excellence. While the rubber eyecup can fold down, it is stiff enough that it is best left up. With the eyecup folded down it can be used with eyeglasses, but only just. Pros: Very good optics and waterproof construction. That's easier with the smaller size of the 82 Naglers when compared to the 100 eyepieces, however I'm working on that. I ordered mine from Omegon and overseas delivery was prompt. Pros: Great optics; comfortable eye relief and eyecup. Eyepiece Field of View - Apparent: 82 Eyepiece Focal Length: 8 mm Eyepiece Eye Relief: 12 mm Eyepiece Series: Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Weight: 6.5 oz. Has similar build quality to TeleVue and has a better feel than its APM counterpart. I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. The top dust cap fits on only when the eyecup is retracted, an inconvenience. My conclusion upon testing this 100 group was that performance was more or less commensurate with price. Today, they report 4mm, 8mm, and 15mm and are $50 apiece less expensive, at $149 each. They made their own products as well. Bottom Line: A good, economical choice for Schmidt-Cassegrains. Except for the Orion Lanthanum 80, all have 1.25-inch barrels and so can be used on any telescope. The Stellarvue 82 and Meades new PWA provide good performance for a much lower price. A 20mm eyepiece with a 100 field for only $300 seems too good to be true! The OEM can be contracted to make them to whatever specifications, exacting or not, that the "name on the product" requires. Well, that was true until the Stellarvue 28mm / 82. Thanks. public University. Make no mistake, these are large and heavy eyepieces, with some requiring 2-inch focusers. Top-ranked German Universities in Munich. Returned it. I find I kind of have to make myself use them more often. Widest range of top-quality eyepieces, from 3.5mm to 31mm Known for having flat fields and high contrast as well as great clarity Backed by Tele Vue's excellent quality control Explore Scientific 82 Degree Eyepieces Comments All focal lengths are waterproof/argon purged Excellent apparent field of view at 82-degrees Now if you had a more expensive 30mm EP, that FOV will remain sharper to the edge. I strongly recommend both the 20 mm and 9 mm Optimus. Some people love the porthole views of 100-degree eyepieces, and others like me would rather have a cozy field stop that's easy to take in with long eye relief. We recommend this as the ideal deep sky eyepiece for viewing nebulae, clusters and galaxies. But then again, thats more or less the point the eyepiece gets out of the way so you no longer have the sense you are looking through a round porthole or window. There are many really good ones available in this category, all across the price spectrum. The 4.5mm Morpheus is sharper than the Ethos SX, by a hair. Can't beat it for the price, especially since the market has gone insane. Does anyone know anything about the new Stellarvue UWA's? Pros: Lightest 100 with good eye relief. It was definitely one of the better ones, as the 24uwa/es82 is, and likely the exact same optics. Bottom Line: Economical but with optical flaws. New from Stellarvue, ultra-wide eyepieces. At least I think they are new because I can't find anything about these focal lengths, they currently have 4, 8, and 15mm available. The only downside is that it's a bit bulky. The 28mm has a 2" barrel, the rest are 1.25". Well to be honest, United Optics products tend to be quite good, whether branded as WO or SV, or something else. The attractive price makes it easier to collect the complete set of three, along with the 8mm and 4mm models. Maybe the following might help: This shows the FoV for a 28mm 82 deg, a 25mm plossl, and a 7mm Xcel EP on my Orion XT8 ( 203mm/1200mm = f5.9), Jon, I 'll be needing some guidance soon; the 28/82 is on the way: using that and my 7mm Xcel as a base, I'll be upgrading/replacing the others to flesh out a "good" set. In WO livery the 4mm's a nice ep for those nights that support it. New from SV? The Stellarvue Ultrawide eyepiece set includes three eyepieces: 4.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view ( click here for specifications) 8.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view ( click here for specifications) These are $65 or so.., Observing in Northern/Southern Michigan, USA, The NEAF Report from nPAE Precision Astro Engineering. With a 10 inch Newtonian at an f5 focal ratio, the 50mm eyepiece you are considering will produce a 10mm exit pupil. There was nothing wrong with them. Its barrel fits only 2-inch focusers and so requires more costly 2-inch filters. Astronomy Clubs, Star Parties, Shows, & Conferences, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, This is not recommended for shared computers. Cons: Heavy and 2-inch only; shorter eye relief. In the AD8, the APM delivers tack-sharp stars to the edge. But I prefer wider fields when possible - 82 to 100 degrees. I just purchased a SV80A (really excited) and they had deal going where you get the 8mm and 15mm for a little over $100 so I jumped on it. But it is an excellent eyepiece, for $80 less than the Tele Vue Ethos. Meades new PWA (Premium Wide Angle) series is effectively a new version of their previous 82 UWA series, which is still available as of November 2020. I was surprised! But I don't think I would want all my eyepieces to be 100 degree. I knew they were re-branded. This is an enthusiast's forum - these folks typically take good care of their stuff. #wo_online_image, #wo_offline_image { For low power, large FOV, I recommend you limit the eyepiece focal length to ~35 mm (thus a 7 mm exit pupil.) Faster scopes (below f5.9) are more sensitive and require more expensive EP's and a probably a coma corrector. I think probably not. That doesn't happen with 100 degree eyepieces. Bottom Line: The best for optics but others provide more comfortable viewing. Not quite so easy a question. Don't have an Astromart account? But I have had really great customer service from stellarvue which is hard to beat, and I have always been happy with their equipment. I do most of my observing with 82 degree eyepieces. I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. Guess I never answered the OP's real question here - favorite FOV, lol. I present them in order of increasing price. The Panoptic 27mm has an even more pleasing view. Eye relief is 15mm, a little longer than the Explore and Stellarvue competitors. Cons: Soft off-axis star images. And it is just for 2-inch focusers and so requires 2-inch filters.

Can I Eat Taro Leaves While Pregnant, Tyler Merritt Net Worth, Sylvania Funeral Home, What Happened To Helen Hayes Estate, Articles S