decision sent to author nature reject

r/biology I buried a dead rat (killed by delayed rat poison or a neighbor's cat) in an iron barrel with soil on Sep 8. Some authors ask the editors to reconsider a rejection decision. Did you find it helpful? The editor responsible for the final decision has the discretion however to weight individual reviewer comments as appropriate based on the expertise of each reviewer in the relevant areas and the reviewers . After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review. Nature 's. We are unsure if the manuscript was unsubmitted or rejected based on the information you have provided. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. There may be cases when you want to submit to another journal prior to receiving a decision. *Please note that using these tools, or any other service, is not a requirement for publication, nor does it imply or guarantee that editors will accept the article, or even select it for peer review. This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission and publication. //--> Cactus Communications. Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. When all the reviewer reports are received, the editors decide to either: If you are invited to revise and resubmit your manuscript, you should follow the instructions provided by the editor in their decision email. Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. Next Steps Return the revised manuscript and response letter within the time period allotted by the editor. 25th Apr, 2017. Nearly all manuscripts are returned to the author with suggestions for revision, condensation, or final polish. Such figures can be particularly helpful to nonspecialist readers of cell, molecular and structural biology papers. Manuscripts should be submitted via our online manuscript submission system. Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript, HANDBOOK: A practical handbook of templates for communicating with the journal. Invite the authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript to address specific concerns. The editor and the editorial team decide whether or not to send the manuscript out to review; the corresponding author is contacted with the decision. edit the language for maximum clarity and precision for those in other disciplines. The experts at Springer Nature Author Services can help you with manuscript preparationincluding English language editing, developmental comments, manuscript formatting, figure preparation, translation, and more. Thank you for visiting nature.com. Authors are provided the opportunity to opt out of this scheme at the completion of the peer review process, before the paper is accepted. If the editors or reviewers have highlighted shortcomings with your paper that you think you can address please indicate how you would do this, such as providing further data. If the scale of revisions means that the authors would need a long period of time and the manuscript would need extensive reworking, it may be suitable to reject the manuscript but invite the authors to resubmit. The paper is rejected with no offer to reconsider a resubmitted version. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. The meaning of 'reject & resubmit' is to indicate that in principle the editor likes the topic for their journal, but the current paper is somehow fatally flawed in their eyes . When submitting a revised manuscript, the author follows the same submission steps and the revised paper again goes through an initial quality check. In this case, it is important to notify the editors that you are withdrawing your manuscript, and get confirmation that this it has been withdrawn, before you submit it to a different journal. Archived post. Cookie Notice Differentiate between reviewer comments and your responses in your letter. Editors can track the transfer offer under 'Submissions with Decision' section of the main menu or via Search Submissions. Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? //-->Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . The corresponding author will receive an e-mail containing a URL. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? After the paper passes the quality check, it is assigned to a Science Editor. Authors submitting to Nature do so on the understanding that they agree to these policies. The editor will solicit reviews of the manuscript from two to three qualified external reviewers. Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxx" has now been seen again by our original reviewers, whose comments are appended below. In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. GSA Bulletin: https://gsabulletin.msubmit.net [CDATA[// > I would recommend the rejection of a manuscript based on the following: 1. Should I thank the editor and reviewers for accepting my paper? Papers may be rejected without review if they are inappropriate for the journal, clearly of poor quality, previously published, etc. It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' In all these cases, it is likely that some time will elapse before Nature can respond, and the paper must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. After the decision letter is sent, the author can respond to the offer via links in the letter or from their Author Main Menu. Under these circumstances, authors are strongly advised not to resubmit a revised version as it will be declined without further review. Your manuscript will be considered officially submitted only after it has passed the quality check. For more information, please see our The author is being contacted about the Editor-in-Chief's decision. Proofs are cycled between Natures production staff, our typesetter and the author by means of an online production-tracking system. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. Revised Submission Nearly all manuscripts are returned to the author with suggestions for revision, condensation, or final polish. The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information such as conflicts of interest and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. Nature has space to publish only 8% or so of the 200 papers submitted each week, hence its selection criteria are rigorous. Remember if your manuscript is sent for a second round of peer review the reviewers will see this letter too. //-->